|
|
|
| |
Did Nader Cost Gore the Election in 2000?
Yes. Nader and several other factors all cost Gore the election. It's wrong to single out Nader; other things were more important. It's wrong to ignore Nader's impact. Yes, Bush, Nader, and Gore all cost Gore the election. So should we ask Bush to cooperate?! If we can't count on our friends, who ... ?
|
|
| |
Did Ralph Nader tell us Gore equaled Bush?
Did Ralph Nader know he was playing the spoiler role?
Did Ralph Nader make a deliberate choice not to cooperate?
|
|
| |
Why Does the Village Voice Oppose Nader's Running?
Ronnie Dugger, the veteran journalist who nominated Nader at the Green convention, learned about Nader's battleground-barnstorming strategy long after the election. "Why hasn't Nader been building the Green Party for the last four years?" he asked me. "Nader was more interested in beating Gore than beating Bush. And Nader has said he will not follow a safe-state strategy in 2004 either." If you read nothing else, read this article.
|
|
| |
How do Republican donors double dip with Nader?
Why Does the Nation oppose Nader's running?
Why is "Public Citizen" so worried about Ralph running again?
Why do crash-test dummies endorse Ralph?
|
|
| |
Can Nader & the Democrats Win-Win in 2004 ?
Yes. Cooperation would help both parties. His supporters could vote for him without being afraid of electing Bush. Kerry would get the votes in crucial states.
|
|
http://2act.org/p/25.html | 08/28/08 19:13 GMT
Modified: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 20:56:39 GMT
|
